RAS BiologyБиология внутренних вод Inland Water Biology

  • ISSN (Print) 0320-9652
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5227

First Finding of Antibacterial Activity in Cestodes

PII
S30345227S0320965225030141-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034522725030141
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 18 / Issue number 3
Pages
527-531
Abstract
The results of the study support the presence of antibacterial substances in the tissues and secretion products of cestodes Eubothrium rugosum and Triaenophorus nodulosus living in the intestines of fish. The growth of test strains Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella sonnei, Salmonella enteritidis, Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was significantly reduced in a liquid medium containing the incubation medium of cestodes or extracts from their tissues. The study revealed a multidirectional effect of the cestode incubation medium, tegument fraction, and tissue extracts on bacterial growth, as well as features of the effect on the bacteria of different taxa. Shigella sonnei demonstrated the highest level of growth suppression due to the antibacterial effect of the incubation media and extracts from Eubothrium rugosum and Triaenophorus nodulosus tegument.
Keywords
антибактериальная активность цестоды тест-культуры бактерий рост бактерий
Date of publication
08.12.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
19

References

  1. 1. Герасимов Ю.В., Соломатин Ю.И, Базаров М.И. и др. 2024. Влияние потепления климата на популяционные показатели рыб водоемов Верхней Волги // Биология внутр. вод. № 4. С. 587. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0320965224040074
  2. 2. Извекова Г.И. 2022. Паразитарные инвазии и кишечная микробиота: аспекты взаимоотношений (обзор) // Изв. РАН. Сер. биол. № 4. С. 401. https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026347022040072
  3. 3. Извекова Г.И., Немцева Н.В., Плотников А.О. 2008. Таксономическая характеристика и физиологические свойства микроорганизмов из кишечника щуки (Esox lucius) // Изв. РАН. Сер. биол. № 6. С. 688.
  4. 4. Плотников А.О., Корнева Ж.В., Извекова Г.И. 2010. Морфо-физиологическая характеристика бактерий, населяющих слизистую кишечника щуки (Esox lucius L.) // Биология внутр. вод № 2. С. 77.
  5. 5. Соколова Т.С., Федорова О.С., Салтыкова И.В. и др. 2019. Взаимодействие гельминтов и микробиоты кишечника: значение в развитии и профилактике хронических неинфекционных заболеваний // Бюл. сибирской медицины. Т. 18. № 3. С. 214.
  6. 6. Ashour D.S., Othman A.A. 2020. Parasite-bacteria interrelationship // Parasitol. Res. V. 119. P. 3145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06804-2
  7. 7. Bruno R., Maresca M., Canaan S. et al. 2019. Worms’ antimicrobial peptides // Mar. Drugs. 17A. № 512. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17090512
  8. 8. Da Costa J.P., Cova M., Ferreira R., Vitorino R. 2015. Antimicrobial peptides: An alternative for innovative medicines? // Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. V. 99. P. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6375-x
  9. 9. Dalton J.P., Skelly P., Halton D.W. 2004. Role of the tegument and gut in nutrient uptake by parasitic platyhelminths // Can. J. Zool. V. 82. № 2. P. 221. https://doi.org/10.1139/z03-213
  10. 10. Dezfuli B.S., Bosi G., DePasquale J.A. et al. 2016. Fish innate immunity against intestinal helminthes // Fish and Shell sh Immunol. V. 50. P. 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2016.02.002
  11. 11. Giacomin P., Agha Z., Loukas A. 2016. Helminths and intestinal ora team up to improve gut health // Trends in Parasitol. V. 32. P. 664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2016.05.006
  12. 12. Izvekova G.I., Frolova T.V., Izvekov E.I. et al. 2021. Localization of the proteinase inhibitor activity in the sh cestode Eubothrium rugosum // J. Fish Diseases. V. 44. P. 1951. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13508.IF2.767
  13. 13. Kashinskaya E.N., Simonov E.P., Poddubnaya L.G. et al. 2023. Trophic diversi cation and parasitic invasion as ecological niche modulators for gut microbiota of white sh // Front. Microbiol. V. 14. P. 1090899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1090899
  14. 14. Kreisinger J., Bastien G., Hauffe H.C. et al. 2015. Interactions between multiple helminthes and the gut microbiota in wild rodents // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. V. 370. P. 20140295. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0295
  15. 15. Loke P., Lim Y.A.L. 2015. Helminths and the microbiota: parts of the hygiene hypothesis // Parasite Immunol. V. 37. P. 314. https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.12193
  16. 16. Midha A., Janek K., Niewienda A. et al. 2018. The intestinal roundworm Ascaris suum releases antimicrobial factors which interfere with bacterial growth and bio lm formation // Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. V. 8. A. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00271
  17. 17. Rausch S., Midha A., Kuhring M. et al. 2018. Parasitic nematodes exert antimicrobial activity and bene t from microbiota-driven support for host immune regulation // Front. Immunol. V. 9. P. 2282. https://doi.org/10.3389/mu.2018.02282
  18. 18. Rowland I., Gibson G., Heinken A. et al. 2018 Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components // Eur. J. Nutr. V. 57. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8
  19. 19. Tassanakajon A., Somboonwiwat K., Amparyup P. 2015. Sequence diversity and evolution of antimicrobial peptides in invertebrates // Devel. and Comp. Immunol. V. 48. P. 324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2014.05.020
  20. 20. Zaiss M.M., Harris N.L. 2016. Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and helminth parasites // Parasite Immunol. V. 38. P. 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.12274
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library